![]() ![]() Section VI of the Agreement (“Obligations”) clearly states that you shall maintain the confidential information in the strictest of confidence at all times. Section V of the Agreement (“Confidential Information”) describes confidential information as any information relating to my client’s business, assets, operations or contracts. On September 8 th, 2017, you signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement as a condition for employment with TechnoShare Inc. This letter serves to inform you that you are currently in violation of the Non-Disclosure Agreement you signed with my client, TechnoShare Inc. Re: Settlement Discussion for Breach of Non-Disclosure Agreement Managing Partner | Adelman, Hodes & Cunningham, PLLC Sample 3 – Breach of Contract If you have any questions, please call (520) 792-6174. Please contact us after you have reviewed the records to discuss settlement of this claim. You will find all the necessary documentation attached to this demand letter, including both the correct and incorrect colonoscopy reports. This letter serves as a pre-litigation courtesy in an attempt to resolve this claim outside of a court of law. ![]() This lawsuit is based on the following causes of action: (1) a professional negligence action based on performing major surgery on the wrong patient and (2) a fraudulent and intentional misrepresentation action based on the cover-up of unnecessary surgery and pointless death. Patel’s estate, we are filing suit against the aforementioned parties. Patel or her family about the mistake after the surgery and instead fraudulently hid the evidence of the surgery, intentionally misrepresented the purpose of the surgery, and created false records in an attempt to “prove” Mrs. She was transferred to the ICU at a different medical facility and died shortly thereafter due to multiple organ failure, an issue that was ultimately caused by the unnecessary surgery.Ĭarondelet St. Patel developed respiratory distress post-operation that required mechanical ventilation. Brink, could find anything, and it was then that they realized they performed surgery on the wrong patient. Neither the pathology department nor the gastroenterologist, Dr. Patel’s colon was removed but the surgeon did not find an oozing cecal mass. On the day of the surgery, the right side of Mrs. Brink was provided with both reports and apparently also failed to notice the variance between the two. Patel for surgery the following week, April 22 nd, 2016. Douglas also received both colonoscopy reports but ignored the fact that they were vastly different, scheduling Mrs. Douglas for an unnecessary right hemicolectomy surgery. Schwartz received both reports but chose not to question the discrepancy, and instead referred Mrs. The second report (“incorrect report”) was based on another patient’s medical condition a bleeding mass in the cecum requiring the removal of half the colon.ĭr. Patel’s medical condition, which was a 5-millimeter mid-transverse polyp that required a follow-up colonoscopy. The first report (“correct report”) contained Mrs. Brink on April 11 th, 2016.Īfter the colonoscopy, two reports were generated with Mrs. The colonoscopy was performed by gastroenterologist Dr. Schwartz scheduled a colonoscopy for the following week to investigate the cause of the anemia. Mary Hospital as well as the following medical staff members: Paul Schwartz, MD Elisa Douglas, MD and Charles Brink, MD. Sarahjeet Patel, are writing you in an effort to resolve a medical malpractice claim without protracted litigation. Cohen & Associates, representatives of the family of the late Mrs. Re: Medical Malpractice Claim of Sarahjeet Patel Please contact our firm at (212) 719-8589 if there are any questions regarding this demand.Īttorney | Dunn & Associates Sample 2 – Medical Malpractice If payment is not made within 7 days, we will have no choice but to take immediate legal action. ![]() This letter serves as the final warning for overdue payment. Therefore, you will be charged an additional $268.80 for the 60 days currently overdue, bringing the total amount owing to $9,228.80. charges 1.5% interest per 30 days, which is a reasonable percentage for the inconvenience. This payment is currently 60 days overdue which, consequently, will result in interest charges applied to the delivery charge. According to the construction materials invoice agreed upon by you and our client, you owe $8,960 for materials plus delivery. On behalf of our client Tottman Supplies Corp., we at Dunn & Associates are writing to inform you of an overdue payment owed to our client. Re: Final Demand Letter Prior to Legal Action ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |